subscribe

Once a day
Get Articles by e-mail:

Also
Get Today's Climate by e-mail:

Climate Science Links

U.S. Government

International

Academic, Non-Governmental

What Those Hacked Climate E-Mails Really Say

A Different Picture Emerges When You Read Them All

By Elizabeth May

Dec 7, 2009

Strange, isn’t it that media are not wondering about who hacked into the computers and who paid them? Or why Dr. Andrew Weaver’s office in Victoria has been broken into twice. My guess is that all the computers of all the climate research centers of the world have been repeatedly attacked, but defenses held everywhere but East Anglia.

The scientists at East Anglia, plus colleagues around the world, are being hung out to dry as though they did something wrong. I did not want to spring to their defense until I read all their emails. Yes, all 3,000 or whatever of them.

Starting from 1996, these good and decent scientists write to each other on e-mail as colleagues and often as co-authors of work in paleoclimatology.

Tough stuff using proxy records to figure out what the temperature was in as many data points as you can find on the planet, going back as far as you can. (Dendochronology chat: Tree rings telling you more about summer temperatures than annual, and mostly from the boreal region).

They wrote each other sharing ideas for handling the records from tree rings. They struggled with how to re-calibrate surface sea temperature records. This was a neat thread. Turns out those navies around the world kept records of the temperature of the sea water before using it in the steam room engines. The temperature records shifted when they stopped using wooden buckets and moved to canvas buckets.

Tough work evening out the temperatures so they are comparable. Or the sorting out of the famous Winter Ice Fairs on the Thames. Lord Lawson and his ilk love this anecdotal stuff. Little Ice Age. Turns out there were weirs on the Thames that kept sections fairly shallow. Once the weirs were removed the river never froze solid again.

These stolen emails are also opening up the personal lives of private and serious scientists. Illnesses, family troubles. Cheery notes of “need to get this surgery over and then I will get busy with my review,” “getting married, did I mention, will work on this next data set a soon as I am back from my honeymoon. ...” or their Christmas emails, sent up to Christmas Eve and back to work before Boxing Day was over.

Wives with cancer, at hospital, revising papers, while awaiting birth of first grandchild. These guys work without a break. They never once suggest “cooking the books” or fudging the science.

How dare the world’s media fall into the trap set by contrarian propagandists without reading the whole set?

Yes, it was a trap. An elaborate sting operation.

At first, the emails talk about requests for data, and they mention to each other that so and so wants the data, I just referred them to all the data we have placed in the public domain. Sometimes they write that they sent more on request, but something seems strange as they do not think the people wanting the data are actually proper scientists.

The emails are the story of serious science up against blogs. Here is one of the emails as they begin to realize they cannot win, from December 2, 2008.

Message from Gavin Schmidt at NASA To Ben Santer at Lawrence Livermore Labs, copied to Phil Jones at East Anglia and others:

"Ben,

"There are two very different things going on here. One is technical and related to the actual science and the actual statistics, the second is political, and is much more concerned with how incidents like this can be portrayed. The second is the issue here. ...

"Thus any increase in publicity on this — whether in the pages of Nature or elsewhere — is much more likely to bring further negative fallout despite your desire to clear the air. Whatever you say, it will still be presented as you hiding data.

"The contrarians have found that there is actually no limit to what you can ask people for (raw data, intermediate steps, additional calculations, sensitivity calculations, all the code, a workable version of the code on any platform, etc) and like Somali pirates they have found that once someone has paid up, they can always shake them down again."

I have got

I have got a really useful blog I have been here reading for about an hour. I am a newbie and your success is very much an inspiration for me.

This is an affecting point

This is an affecting point of view on this topic. I am happy you shared your ideas and I find myself agreeing. I appreciate your clear writing and the effort you have spent on this post. Many thanks for the good work and good luck with your site, I greatly look forward to future updates.

Your blog is outstanding!

Your blog is outstanding! I mean, I have never been so entertained by anything in my life! I mean, how did you manage to find something that matches your style of writing so well? I am really happy I started reading this today. Thanks for sharing it here.

Its all about chasing

Its all about chasing shadows.
By that I mean latching on to this or that latest, most innovative idea that some self styled money making guru has put out in the hope it’ll go viral and make them a lot of money off the backs of all the headless chickens who will follow them blindly down a blind alley. Its a shame but a truism nonetheless that people will follow where someone they see as an expert leads. Even if they lead them to certain disaster, which is what most of the gurus tend to do to their flocks.
The trick is to recognize a shadow when you see it!

Climategate and Shame of Global Warming Alarmists

Elizabeth May, Canada Green Party Leader, is, like Al Gore, an unrepentent liar. Yesterday, Snake Oil Al told reporters that the most recent email in the CRU hall of shame is from 10 years ago when in fact the latest email is from early last month.

Elizabeth May likewise laments that no one is asking who hacked the CRU computers and actually has the stupidity to wonder who paid the alleged hackers when it hasn't even been established that this is the work of hackers. Noted security experts say it is far more likely in situations like this one that emails were leaked by an insider.

If the mainstream media hasn't been asking who's responsible for the exposed emails and computer code from CRU, it's because the mainstream media has until just this week had its head in the sand.

Fairly Certain It Was A Hack

East Anglia was not the only lab hacked. Most of the others were discovered and stopped. An Office in Victoria caught 2 guys trying to hack emails and ran them off. Our NSA knows exactly who they are it just depends on whether they want to go after them.

Dyslexics Untie!

Strange- I read a couple hundred of the 1073 files, some of which contain many emails in a continuous thread.
What struck me was the absolute intellectual corruption.
As far as the actual details of the programming - it was data rape, no ambiguity about that - and it's in plain sight.
The emails are not a portrayal of mischeivous guys dedicated to science by any stretch of the imagination - they were a shocking display of the worst vanity and vituperaton imaginable. They got people blacklisted and even 'ousted'. It could have been no worse at the vatican dealing with Galileo.
They deserve prosecution for the most serious betrayal of trust, of science and of humanity.

People Ousted

Yeah, they were absolute frauds.

For Andy and Thomas

Andy, you wrote: "You do realize that the East Anglia CRU destroyed all their original data from actual climate measurements, right?"
Please read this:
Then consider whether allegations of "destroyed data" might not be defamatory.

Thomas: you appear to know what "hide the decline" means. You may even know better than Jones what it means. So, why don't you give us a lecture on just what is meant by "hide the decline"?

this is amusing

"The one scientist I think has some explaining to do is Dr. Wang at State University of New York at Albany who has told colleagues for years he has the hard data from Chinese meteorological stations but never seems to be able to produce it. It is a very small piece of data in the scheme of things, but Wang should either produce the data or explain where he got the numbers."

You do realize that the East Anglia CRU destroyed all their original data from actual climate measurements, right? We're supposed to take it as a matter of faith that the modified data they still have was modified correctly, without being able to see the data that they started with. Why exactly does Dr. Wang need to produce his hard data when the CRU doesn't need to?

Original data at NOAA and NASA

You can get all the original data your little heart desires at NOAA and NASA. Knock yourself out.

That the emails don’t

That the emails don’t change the consensus view on climate change is obviously true. It’s not like respected scientists are going to suddenly change their positions. No new papers have been published based on anything revealed in the emails which really should be the judge of what the consensus is anyway. In addition there is also no “smoking gun” here that shows any one study was wrong.

What the emails have revealed to me is that the consensus view has never been what the IPCC and other politicians like May report. These scientists are the top in the field and reading the emails shows just how divided they are and how few actually believe Mann, Jones, etc. My view of the consensus:

The planet has undergone a general warming trend over the last few hundred years. The causes of this are a mixture of natural variation and human influences. The increase of CO2 in the atmosphere caused by humans is known to contribute to the greenhouse effect which increases global temperatures. This effect may have been a significant factor in the recent 20th century warming but there is no way to tell for sure based on our current understanding of the global climate.

Claims of unprecedented warming based entirely on CO2 are just politics.

ps there were 1073 emails not 3000

You could not be more wrong

The conduct shown in the email is outrageous and totally unacceptable. If that conduct had related to corporate financial manipulation, a criminal investigation would ensue, and if the conduct was found to be true, people would go to jail. Enron executive used tricks to hide declines and tried to rig the peer-review process (financial auditors). But Enron was child's play compared to this stuff. These emails relate to something far more important (and expensive) than the value of one corporation's stock.

Tricks and Hide Declines

You have no idea what your are talking about in science. Science is NOT a business. Ask a scientist to explain what a trick is to you.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options