subscribe

Once a day
Get Articles by e-mail:

Also
Get Today's Climate by e-mail:

Climate Science Links

U.S. Government

International

Academic, Non-Governmental

Scientists Suggest Storing CO2 in Offshore Basalt Formations

More Secure than Sandstone and Close to Major Metro Areas

By Matthew Berger

Jan 5, 2010

As Pangea broke up and the plates drifted apart 200 million years ago, magma seeped out of the fissures in the Earth's crust. That magma became flows of lava, and that lava, rapidly cooling in the air and water, became the basalt now found in places like the United States' Northwest and East Coast.

Now, researchers say, those basalt formations could become a main depository for excess carbon dioxide. A in this week's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences points out the advantages of using the East Coast's on- and offshore basalt flows for the sequestration of carbon dioxide captured from power plants in the region.

In carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), carbon dioxide from emitters like coal-fired plants would be compressed into a liquid state and pumped into underground reservoirs such as empty oil wells. The idea is to minimize the climate change-related effects of carbon dioxide emissions by keeping, as much as possible, the carbon released from formerly underground mineral deposits out of the carbon-overloaded atmosphere.

The PNAS study's authors, from Columbia University’s , say basalt — particularly offshore basalt — may be the ideal choice for a sequestration reservoir.

Basalt's advantages are several-fold. The igneous rock is full of tiny pores into which the liquefied carbon dioxide might be pumped. Once contained deep within the rock formations, the carbon dioxide would react with the basalt to form, over a relatively short time period, a carbonate mineral resembling limestone. This is expected to significantly decrease the risk of leakage, a major concern with previous CCS proposals that looked at shale and sandstone repositories.

“The basalt itself is very reactive, and in the end, you make limestone,” co-author Dennis Kent said. “It’s the ultimate repository.”

But even storing carbon in basalt is far from a perfect a solution to the world's fossil fuel-caused problems, some activists say.

"It's great that the science is advancing, but the fact is the science isn't going to be ready in time," says Greenpeace's Emily Rochon.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says global emissions are going to need to peak in five to seven years to avoid the worst effects of climate change, she says, and CCS technologies will not be commercially ready until 2020 to 2030. She says the focus, rather, should be on reducing the burning of fossil fuels.

It is not clear how much time it would take to implement the Columbia team's basalt plan, still in the preliminary stages. The next step would be "to get some exploratory surveying and drilling going," said lead author David Goldberg, a geophysicist. The study suggests nine areas to start with.

The main point of the study is that basalt may be a superior alternative to other CCS plans. A plan to inject carbon dioxide from a coal-fired plant in Linden, N.J., for instance, has drawn criticism because it is not clear the sandstone into which it would pump would prevent the carbon dioxide from leaking out again.

But deep within the offshore basalt formations, the carbon dioxide would be too heavy, relative to the surrounding water, to come back up, in addition to the fact that it would become solidified into carbonate minerals — and would have hundreds of feet of marine sediment above it. As it fills in the porous interstices of the rock, the carbon dioxide is expected to displace only seawater.

Little knowledge about this circle

Sorry for the sarcastic header. CO2 sequestration with its safety, its degree of proven results and its analogies to petroleum reservoirs containing often much less dense gases (meaning higher buoyancy pressure) for millions of years, is evidently a way to go these next 40-50 years where we will continue to depend completely on fossil fuel. Carbon sequestration is just as safe as all those other gas storage operations going on around the world, and they have for close to 100 years. Before that for a few millions of years, the same rocks have kept buoyant hydrocarbons safely in place, with few noticable observed leaks in human history. And for each year we wait, billions of tons are just vented off to the atmosphere...

Little fate in this Toxic Circle

Think about this toxic circle: The coal industry mines the carbon by knocking down mountains and filling in streams and valleys with the residue. They ship the coal by rail to power stations that burn the coal that then pollutes the air with smog, acid rain, CO2, and fly ash. but wait there's more; millions of yards of toxic ash residue has been piling up for years with no place to store it safely.

Storing CO2 in the earth and hoping it doesn't leak and come back to kill us seems a precarious solution at best. Are you sure this is possible? Or, is the coal industry stalling until they can elect politicians they can buy to continue their massive pollution of the planet?

Although I think NatGas is a bad method to generate power, I still think it should be used instead of coal. It produces half the air pollution of coal and best of all, no material residue to pollute the earth. The best plan is to look at NatGas as the best interim solution until we can get clean energy plants in place. Stop building coal plants, retrofit the existing plants with NatGas and then take NatGas plants off-line when you can replace the plants with clean energy.

This, of course will never happen as long as we keep seeking a solution based on politics and not on science.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options