facebook twitter subscribe

Once a day
Get Articles by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

Also
Get Today's Climate by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

EPA Says Texas Lawsuit Will Not Thwart Enforcement of 'Tailoring' Rule

Texas's claim that it doesn't have to comply with the 2011 greenhouse gas rule deadline is unsubstantiated, says agency

By Elizabeth McGowan

Aug 10, 2010

WASHINGTON—The unofficial motto of the Lone Star State might be "Don't Mess With Texas." But do state officials really expect federal authorities to heed such a maxim?

When it comes to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), evidently the answer is yes.

Via lawsuit and letter, Texas has fired off the fiercest opposition yet to the EPA's efforts to deploy what's known as the "tailoring" rule to regulate carbon dioxide from power plants, energy-intensive industries and other stationary sources.

In their six-page letter dated Aug. 2, Texas attorney general Greg Abbott and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality chairman Bryan Shaw came right out and said they are refusing to comply with the January 2011 tailoring rule deadline.

"On behalf of the State of Texas, we write to inform you that Texas has neither the authority nor the intention of interpreting, ignoring or amending its laws in order to compel the permitting of greenhouse gas emissions," they wrote to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson and Alfredo Armendariz, regional administrator for EPA Region 6 in Dallas.

Tom Smith, longtime executive director of the Texas office of Public Citizen, told SolveClimate News in an interview from his Austin office that the vociferous challenge isn’t all that shocking.

Smith said the leader of the EPA's Air and Radiation Office, Gina McCarthy, understands the difficulties and intricacies of the Clean Air Act and the tailoring rule.

"I think the tailoring rule is fair," he said. "She hoped by coming up with a multistage rule, she could appear reasonable and not break the backs of state agencies and create an impossible regulatory morass. But states like Texas make this impossible."

This week, the EPA labeled Texas's claims as unsubstantiated. An EPA spokeswoman said neither the letter nor the lawsuit will deter the agency from marching forward with its tailoring rule mandate.

"EPA's measured steps are in response to a Supreme Court decision (EPA vs. Massachusetts) issued more than three years ago," spokeswoman Enesta Jones wrote in an e-mail response. "We are not at liberty to ignore the law, and the letter's unsubstantiated claims are the same sort that have been made — and ultimately proven wrong — every time EPA has, over the past 40 years, moved to implement the Clean Air Act's protections of public health and welfare."

Currently, the White House Office of Management and Budget is reviewing a rule that could empower the EPA to enforce federal regulations on greenhouse gases if states choose not to cooperate.

Texas Seeking Friendly Appeals Court

State authorities had until early August to let the EPA know if they would need to rewrite state laws or regulations to meet tailoring rule restrictions.

The right thing to do

It seems that anytime there are issues with the environment or the laws that people and states are expected to go by the one thing that people always forget is "who is going to pay for it or make up the cost." I really wish doing the right thing didn't mean politics or takeovers. It's just the right thing to do.

casino online , I think that gambling at an Italian online casino is not the worst gambling situation we could get ourselves into and the casino games are fun.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options