Colorado and other states with ambitious climate change agendas said on Wednesday they fear gubernatorial elections in their states could dial back job-creating clean energy policy.
Several Republican candidates in the 37 governors' races have suggested that they would undo renewable electricity standards (RES) that require a boost in cleaner-burning fuels if elected. They claim such measures harm the economy, chiefly through higher electricity bills, which is especially true in the Midwest and South, where solar and wind still lag behind the rest of the nation.
Colorado's , championed by Gov. Bill Ritter, orders utilities to get 30 percent of power from renewable sources by 2020. Supporters say the policy led to the creation of 20,000 new green jobs since 2004.
Ritter, who is not running for re-election, said it could be under attack.
India is today expected to become the first country in the world to commit to publishing a new set of accounts which track the nation's plants, animals, water and other "natural wealth" as well as financial measurements such as GDP.
The announcement is due to be made at , and it is hoped that such a move by a major developing economy will prompt other countries to join the initiative.
Work on agreeing common measures, such as the value of ecosystems and their "services" for humans – from relaxation to clean air and fertile soils – will be co-ordinated by the World Bank, which hopes it can sign up 10-12 nations and publish the results by 2015 at the latest.
WASHINGTON—In Gene Karpinski’s eyes, Nancy Pelosi is the most pro-environment speaker of the House ever. And as the president of the League of Conservation Voters, Karpinski doesn’t want to rock that green boat.
Here’s why the arithmetic leading up to the Nov. 2 midterm election makes him nervous: Republicans need to take over just 39 seats in the House to supplant Pelosi, a California Democrat. And political handicappers are predicting a GOP net gain of at least 40 during these tumultuous, tea partying and anti-establishment times.
A coalition of state water regulators is introducing a first-ever national Web tool to post potentially toxic chemicals used in the gas drilling technique of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, on the Internet for all to see.
The Okla.-based says its system will allow drillers to publish chemical recipes used in the new wells they have "fracked." Disclosure will be on a voluntary basis only, it said, but the group is optimistic firms will participate.
"My hope is that if we build it, they will use it," Mike Paque, executive director of the council, told SolveClimate News.
The "chemical registry" for fracking is being funded by the U.S. and is expected to launch at the end of November. "No one else is doing anything more progressive," Paque said.
But environmental groups, who fear fracking fluids are causing irreversible damage to groundwater, say anything voluntary is not likely to be enough.
Editor's Note: This is the second of two parts. You can read the first part here.
Haluk Direskeneli says he's “an engineer, not an environmentalist.” But he's been threatened with a lawsuit for criticizing Turkish energy investors who disregard the environment, as several environmentalists who have opposed power plants have been lately.
An energy consultant and member of the Chamber of Mechanical Engineers in Ankara, Turkey's capital, Direskeneli says that he doesn't object to power plants as long as they follow environmental regulations.
But after he published an on weaknesses in the licensing process for new power plants in Turkey, he was told to retract it—or prepare for a lawsuit.
WASHINGTON—Concern that a proposed oil pipeline could irreversibly damage his home state’s aquifer and most fragile landscape has prompted Nebraska’s junior senator to ask the U.S. State Department to pursue an alternate, more easterly, route.
Republican Sen. Mike Johanns is urging officials to reroute the Keystone XL pipeline north from Steele City, Neb., to the U.S./Canada border in North Dakota instead of Montana.
Such a solution, he says, would keep TransCanada’s pipeline out of Nebraska’s sandhills and away from the Ogallala Aquifer, which supplies 78 percent of the water supply and 83 percent of the water for irrigation in the Cornhusker State.
The government today gave the green light to eight new reactors, in a move that will see the UK push forward with the most ambitious fleet of new stations in Europe.
As , the coalition also confirmed that it is .
The backing for a new generation of nuclear power stations marks a significant political compromise by the climate and secretary, Chris Huhne, after the Liberal Democrats had campaigned against new nuclear in the general election. The Conservatives, however, had backed new nuclear power stations.
Editor's note: This the first installment in a two-part series.
Ask Turks to name the most beautiful natural places in their country, and they’ll almost inevitably mention Yalova: a small province of resort towns along the southern shore of the Marmara Sea.
Just an hour away from Istanbul by ferry, Yalova’s population of about 200,000 is sustained by its tourism industry. Thousands of visitors flock to the region each summer, drawn by natural wonders such as the Yalova thermal springs. Turkey’s first president, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, built a private pavilion there.
But today, a different kind of thermal presence is concerning the residents of Yalova.
WASHINGTON— This year, call it the .
The League of Conservation Voters bucked tradition by adding a California ballot measure to its trademark list, reserved until now for members of Congress who consistently vote against clean energy and the environment.
Proposition 23—an oil company-funded effort to repeal the Golden State’s landmark clean energy law—joined 12 senators and representatives as the 13th and final addition to the league’s list for this midterm election cycle.
“I think the eyes of the country and most of the world are watching what happens in California,” LCV president Gene Karpinski told SolveClimate News in a post-announcement interview Thursday.
Forestry advocates are warning that a UN-backed plan to preserve disappearing forests in poor nations could do the opposite if alleged loopholes are not closed.
Under the politically popular plan, known as REDD, or , rich countries would pay poorer ones for slowing their rates of tree loss.
The scheme is seen as critical for averting dangerous climate change.