Once a day
Get Articles by e-mail:

Get Today's Climate by e-mail:

Climate Science Links

U.S. Government


Academic, Non-Governmental

California Defends Climate Law, Remains National Bastion of Clean Energy Economy

61 percent of voters say no to referendum that would have suspended the state's landmark climate legislation

By Jennifer Pinkowski

Nov 3, 2010

California voters defended their landmark climate law by yesterday, ending questions over whether the state's 2006 legislation aimed at curbing greenhouse gas emissions would be suspended until the state unemployment rate fell by more than half.

While election results in the rest of the nation make the outlook for federal climate legislation dim, yesterday's vote in California solidifies the position of the state as the country's bastion of the clean energy economy, whose outsized GDP will unavoidably influence policy and commerce across the nation as its climate law gets implemented.

Some 61 percent of voters rejected Prop. 23. While pre-election polls indicated they were likely to turn down the controversial ballot measure, which was largely funded by out-of-state oil interests, the overwhelming defeat has advocates thrilled.

“It’s clearly a strong victory for clean energy in the face of scare tactics in a weak economy,” said Steven Maviglio, a spokesperson for , the coalition that campaigned heavily against the referendum. The defeat, Maviglio told SolveClimate News, indicates voters believe California can have both “a strong economy and a clean environment.”

In , Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who came out swinging this election season when his signature Global Warming Solutions Act (also known as ) was threatened by Prop. 23, will be replaced by Democrat Jerry Brown, who defeated Republican Meg Whitman 54 percent to 41 percent. Senator Barbara Boxer (D) was elected to a fourth term, besting Republican challenger Carly Fiorina with 52 percent of the vote to Fiorina’s 43 percent.

These results make California distinct nationally. In Washington, the and nearly took the Senate. Republicans picked up 10 governors’ seats. An anti-incumbent mood, Tea Party activism and disapproval of President Barack Obama’s performance all factored into GOP victories.

It’s not the first time California has bucked the trend—and when it comes to climate legislation, advocates said, that’s a very good thing. They foresee national implications for the defeat of Prop. 23, which they characterize as the largest public vote on climate legislation in U.S. history. More than 9 million Californians cast a vote on the ballot measure.

Its defeat has awakened a “sleeping giant,” said Wade Crowfoot, West Coast political director for (EDF), which co-sponsored AB 32 with the (NRDC). “The people who defeated this are the new face of energy.”

What It Means for California: Clean Energy Agenda to Take "Quantum Leap"

Crowfoot is referring to what Maviglio calls a "well-financed and broad" movement to defeat Prop. 23. “We built a long-lasting bipartisan coalition: environmentalists, small businesses, Republicans, venture capitalists, municipal officials,” Maviglio said.

"Well-financed" is clear: with $31.2 million in the coffers, No on 23 outspent Prop. 23’s supporters by 3 to 1, a margin the Yes on 23 campaign attributed to brazen self-interest by wealthy venture capitalists who "apparently felt their millions would be better invested in defeating a voter initiative that would have postponed additional subsidies for green tech, instead of in green industries themselves,” the campaign said in a statement released after the polls closed.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options