The science of climate change arrived at the doctor’s office last week.
The setting was the Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI) in Phoenix. There, a packed symposium of allergists and immunologists heard Department of Agriculture researcher Lewis Ziska connect increasing temperatures and CO2 levels in the environment with a longer, more intense pollen season in the U.S.
It’s a connection that promises added misery for 30 million allergy sufferers.
“Global warming is having an effect on people’s allergies,” Ziska, a Ph.D. plant physiologist with the USDA in Beltsville, Maryland, said in an interview following the CO2 symposium, which was funded by the Environmental Protection Agency.
“From the initial data we have, it appears that there is a correlation between latitude and the length of the ragweed season that is occurring in North America, as a function of climate change,” Ziska said.
“If it is in fact true,” Ziska said, “this is the first data we have that shows—not just on a regional level, not just in the laboratory, but in real time—that global warming is having an effect on people’s allergies.
Local Evidence Becomes Continental Trend
Global warming temperatures rise the closer you get to the two poles. So Ziska and his colleagues have worked on the assumption that the closer North American ragweed grows to the North Pole, the stronger the reaction of the plants to CO2. In theory, this scenario would result in a higher rate of growth, a longer growing season and intensified pollen production.
Ziska’s previous research found this to be the case at the local and regional levels. In 2003 he and his colleagues studied ragweed growth in outdoor urban, rural, semirural and suburban environments around Baltimore.
They found that ragweed grew faster, flowered earlier and produced more biomass and pollen in the city than outside the city. The reason: the urban site was 30 percent warmer than the rural sites, mirroring, Ziska said, projected warming for the nation as a whole.
Researchers have made similar findings in Italy and other regions of the eastern U.S.
Now, Ziska’s tracking of ragweed growth has expanded to the continental level. The scientist and his colleagues have monitored the plant’s growth along a north-south “transect” ranging from East Texas to lower Canada, with the assumption that higher latitudes will produce more growth.
Research Backs Up What Doctors See in Patients
Ziska is cautious about discussing the details of the newest data because his study is pending acceptance by a peer-reviewed scientific journal. But his discoveries about ragweed—the biggest cause of allergy sufferers’ itchy, runny eyes and noses, particularly in the fall—are instantly fascinating to those on the front lines: allergists/immunologists.
One of them is Dr. Kevin McGrath, of Wethersfield, Conn., a Board of Regents member of the ACAAI, a professional association for allergists, immunologists and related health professionals.
McGrath was a moderator of the CO2 symposium where Ziska presented his ragweed findings.
“We all have been seeing, clinically, increasing pollen seasons, a little longer pollen seasons—but that’s not ‘scientific,’ that’s our clinical experience, and most allergists have recognized that,” McGrath told SolveClimate News.
“I think the most interesting thing here is the science: to show the reason why we’re seeing higher pollen counts and maybe a longer pollen season—and that would be the increase in the carbon dioxide level,” he said.
Two other scientists presented findings on the connection between plant growth and increasing CO2. Dr. John Spengler, professor of environmental health at Harvard’s School of Public Health, spoke of increases in poison ivy, poison oak, and insect-carried diseases like lyme disease.
Dr. Wanda Phipatanakul, an assistant professor of pediatrics at the Harvard Medical School and Children’s Hospital, talked about spikes in indoor pollen levels as well as the growth of mold, aggravated by greater humidity and more instances of flooding.
More Pollen, But Higher Yield for "Weedy" Crops?