facebook twitter subscribe
view counter

Donate to SolveClimate News

Once a day
Get Articles by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

Also
Get Today's Climate by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

REDD Forest Rescue Deal Still Draws Bitter Debate, Weak Agreement Feared

Nations are at loggerheads over fundamental issues, most notably Bolivia and the U.S. and Australia.

By Stacy Feldman

Dec 3, 2010

CANCUN, MEXICO -- Big holes remain in some of the most basic but contentious issues in a UN-backed scheme to prevent deforestation, fueling speculation of a weaker than expected forestry agreement at the Cancun climate talks.

Sticking points include the mechanisms to monitor critical safeguards that protect biodiversity and the rights of indigenous people and the question of whether to finance the plan with public money or offsets.

"They're all pretty fundamental issues," said Davyth Stewart, a lawyer with the UK-based campaign group Global Witness. "Each of these, depending on how you decide it, could lead to a really bad deal."

Stewart is not alone in that view.

"We're really only a few words away from a good agreement — and similarly, a few words away from a bad agreement," said Roman Czebiniak, a political adviser for Greenpeace International, who has been in the forestry negotiations.

Under the plan, known as REDD, or Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation, rich countries would pay poorer ones billions of dollars per year to preserve their endangered forests. Trees absorb carbon when they grow. Razing them is responsible for one-fifth of global warming emissions, according to UN estimates.

The Nov. 29-Dec. 10 Cancun  talks were predicted to deliver major progress on the plan, which has broad support from rich and poor nations. Now there are doubts.

Christiana Figueres, head of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), however, maintained optimism. "The work on REDD" is "well advanced" and has "reached compromise," she told reporters in Cancun on Friday.

"[It] basically needs to wait for the other areas of the package to reach the same level of compromise, so that there can be an overall balance across the entire package," Figueres said.

Countries At Loggerheads

But the drama unfolding behind the scenes among nations tells a different story, observers say.

"They're using process to delay decisions made on substance," Czebiniak told SolveClimate News.

As of Friday evening, at least three bracket-filled negotiating texts were still on the table, just days before the high-level segment of talks is set to begin. Nations are at loggerheads over fundamental issues, most notably Bolivia and the U.S. and Australia.

Bolivia wants stronger safeguards around indigenous peoples' rights and to rule out the option of using REDD as an offset scheme, to which it is ideologically opposed.

Bolivia claims, along with other critics, that offsets do nothing to stop the flow of carbon into the atmosphere. Instead, such projects allow companies to meet carbon-cutting mandates through saving forests in far-off places, while continuing business-as-usual at home, they argue.

Australia and U.S., who want to include forest conservation projects into the global carbon trade, are adamant about including a reference to "carbon markets" in Cancun text.

"That's probably the most contentious issue [in the REDD talks]," Nils Hermann Ranum of Rainforest Foundation Norway, a campaign group, said. 

Saudi Arabia is also causing parties concern.

The oil kingdom, which has no forests and no financing obligations under REDD, is being accused of blocking progress on forestry to get concessions from countries in other areas of the talks.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options