Once a day
Get Articles by e-mail:

Get Today's Climate by e-mail:

Climate Science Links

U.S. Government


Academic, Non-Governmental

Is Biomass Clean or Dirty Energy? We Won't Know for 3 Years

Should turning tree parts into electricity qualify as renewable power or is the practice dirtier than burning coal?

By Stacy Feldman

Jan 13, 2011

In the meantime — as the agency considers the future of biomass energy policy in the nation — it gave the industry the greenlight to use biomass at coal burning and other fossil-powered facilities to control pollution, a designation known as "Best Available Control Technology."

Sheehan called the idea of burning woody material to clean-up coal "ironic."

"The science already shows that for greenhouse gases, biomass is dirtier than coal," she said.

Kevin Bundy, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, agreed: "The EPA’s Orwellian suggestion that biomass pollution is a form of pollution control makes it look like the agency has already made up its mind to ignore the science."

BPA, which represents 80 biomass power plants, said the decision to qualify biomass as BACT "is really helpful."

"I would be absolutely shocked if EPA three years from now, says 'We've actually reconsidered the science,'" Cleaves said.

Coal Instead of Trees?

Industry fears that if biomass emissions were regulated under the tailoring rule, power producers would be encouraged to burn more coal instead, at a time when the nation is grappling with downsizing its carbon ouput during a time of record-breaking temperature increases.

"Obviously fossil fuels are a more efficient energy source, and if you layer on too many regulations ... utilities and other producers are going to lean toward fossil fuel use," Whiting said.

A recent study out of the University of Washington supported that point of view. Called a compilation of previous research, the study concluded that "new investment in bioenergy development will be discouraged and existing biofuel facilities may be motivated to shut down or use more fossil fuels."

The resource is seen as a particularly valuable in Southern states, which lack wind and solar opportunities available in other states.

For Sheehan and other advocates, the game plan now is to try to put the industry a freeze on growth of the industry until 2014.

"We will be calling for a moratorium on all permitting for biomass plants during this three-year period," she said.

Cleaves of BPA said "the idea of a moratorium has no basis in law" under the Clean Air Act, which "certainly doesn't prohibit biomass plants from being constructed."

"To the contrary," he said, "I think every government out there is encouraging biomass."

Thank you very much for

Thank you very much for sharing interesting topic. You are giving very good stuff through this post. I will suggest my friends to read this post. By making use of biomass and the carbon cycle, we can easily help get the world back to its natural cleanliness and keep pollution away while still creating energy for us to use. I have read one article "Biomass and The CarbonCycle" at What do you think about Biomass and The CarbonCycle?


Three years sound like a long time. Still, there are already reports showing that biomass is clearly better than fossil fuels for running our cars.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options